Comments on: HFW and Bird & Bird become latest firms to up NQ lawyer pay

By: Lool

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 19:25:17 +0000

Legal Cheek seem to have left a typo – there’s no way that law firms can be paying NQs that little.

]]>

By: Cc

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 10:13:07 +0000

Ngl, I have no idea what HFW do.

]]>

By: Toototwkk

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:47:08 +0000

I mean 98k is good whack and if it’s to be true the hrs are reasonably bliss at B&B, very good deal imo

]]>

By: Shed Zeppelin

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:46:40 +0000

By: BxS

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:31:29 +0000

Culture at B&B is indeed excellent (having worked at a range of MC and SC firms previously) so i expect they can probably get away with this unlike many firms

]]>

By: Coulda Been Records-er

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:28:32 +0000

In reply to SQE-er.

Using culture-er to justify-er underpaying-er is non-sensical-er.

The culture-er doesn’t pay-er for the long hours-er that B&B lawyers-er do in fact-er work-er.

]]>

By: Cxx

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:14:22 +0000

They rose before AG and Watson Farley??

]]>

By: Hhhh

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:09:53 +0000

By: SQE-er

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:04:32 +0000

Bird & Bird is likely one of the few firms that can actually get away with saying their culture justifies their lower pay imho. 98k at Bird and Bird is arguably pretty good.

]]>

By: Shed Bundy

Mon, 01 Jul 2024 08:03:46 +0000

Going from 95k to 100k and 98k respectively feels incredibly stingy… no doubt Sheds will do the same…

]]>