Comments on: Taylor v Catterall: rumble in the public law jungle? https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/ Legal news, insider insight and careers advice Sat, 05 Mar 2022 10:53:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Anon https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157130 Sat, 05 Mar 2022 10:53:01 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157130 Has to be one of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen in boxing.

Thanks for the article!

]]> By: đŸ˜© https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157102 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:14:55 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157102 Judicial review has no place in regulating the behaviour or actions of sports governing bodies. Contractual remedies and a claim in contract is the correct place for this. Once you expand the meaning of “public body” where does that end? How many more claims will be brought to an already backlogged system?

]]> By: G https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157085 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 11:25:27 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157085 In reply to You won, but at what cost?.

The fact that Max had the audacity to change his number to #1 is completely taking the mick.

So tactless lol

You can tell he initially chose 33 as a mimicry to Lewis’s 44

]]> By: Al https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157080 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 11:19:49 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157080 If there was ever an argument for bringing back trial by combat then surely it was this case?

]]> By: You won, but at what cost? https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157069 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:42:32 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157069 I personally don’t know how the Josh Taylor’s and Max Verstappen’s can go on with the W knowing there is an asterisk in the win and everyone is debating over the validity of their victory.

]]> By: SportsHead https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157068 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:39:16 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157068 Sports in general is in a state of controversy at the moment.

The VAR and poor refereeing in football.

The Michael Masi inconsistent decision making in F1.

]]> By: Boxing Fan https://www.legalcheek.com/lc-journal-posts/taylor-v-catterall-rumble-in-the-public-law-jungle/#comment-1157065 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:07:09 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?post_type=lc-journal-posts&p=173127#comment-1157065 It was not a UD, SD… One judge scored 113-112 Catterrall.

]]>