Comments on: Reed Smith and Ashurst push NQ solicitor pay to £125K https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/ Legal news, insider insight and careers advice Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:44:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: A man called Thomas https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195303 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:44:34 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195303 In reply to Morality police.

You clearly don’t work in private practice if you have this naive view

]]>
By: Barney the tree https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195302 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:42:30 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195302 In reply to Tom.

About tree fiddy

]]>
By: Not true https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195300 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:25:40 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195300 In reply to Reality Check.

This just isn’t true. There are plenty of excellent trainees who are not being kept on simply by virtue of the practice areas that they want to qualify into having no NQ spots due to budgetary constraints and/or hiring freezes.

]]>
By: Old Timer https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195298 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:42:00 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195298 It’s interesting that Ashurst has financially positioned itself below HSF and Macs.

10-15+ years ago the firm was a top tier PE shop, now it’s seemingly energy and tech focussed with little to no PE partners left – all have been poached. Does some M&A here and there but it’s not the corporate power it once was… likely going to need a transformational merger to catch up to the “global elite”.

]]>
By: Wow https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195297 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:31:36 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195297 In reply to Outrageous.

Insane

]]>
By: Outrageous https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195296 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:22:41 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195296 CRS to 97.5k save for certain high performing lawyers in certain teams who have had salaries raised on basis of the NQ pay being 110k. Some CRS 5 pqes now on 130k plus if they’re high performers.

]]>
By: Slaughters trainee https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195293 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:26:13 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195293 This is probably the worst day of my life.

]]>
By: Leftie again https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195291 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:22:57 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195291 In reply to Morality police.

Ok this is clearly a troll. Readers, please do not associate this view with the left. There is no right to a six figure job, we know that.

]]>
By: Morality police https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195286 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:41:13 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195286 In reply to I’m a leftie but come on man.

Elite firms (US or UK) have moral obligations to keep trainees and to provide them with a platform to develop their career. Hiring freshers as trainees and then not give them a NQ job is brutal and morally wrong.

Regulatory intervention is the only way to enforce the values of our society.

]]>
By: I’m a leftie but come on man https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195284 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:16:21 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195284 In reply to Unretained US firm trainee.

Not sure forcing businesses to keep employees on is ever a good thing. Stronger employment protections? Sure. Incentives to keep them on? Sure. Strongly worded advice/indignation? Sure. “Forcing firms to keep trainees” ? Massive slippery slope.

]]>
By: Which one https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195283 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:12:01 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195283 DLA or Dentons is the McDonalds of law firms ?

]]>
By: DLA to 200k https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195282 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:11:18 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195282 Pay rise galore!!! Whoop

]]>
By: Macs lifer https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195281 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:09:43 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195281 Travers to 125k. They’ve given up their battle with Macs

]]>
By: Reality Check https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195280 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:07:11 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195280 In reply to Unretained US firm trainee.

Why should firms be made to keep trainees on? I say this as a trainee about to qualify too. Surely a natural consequence of ever-increasing pay is that firms are going to be more brutal in their decision-making on who stays and who goes? People who would previously been a “ah go on then” will find themselves without an offer, but those who would have comfortably been retained will continue to be retained anyway.

]]>
By: Unretained US firm trainee https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195276 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:31:37 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195276 The NQ market is carnage. What’s the point of pay rise when there aren’t any jobs around. The SRA should intervene and force firms to retain trainees – this is the only right thing to do.

]]>
By: Eversheds to £181k https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195275 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:18:52 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195275 Firms that market themselves as US (I’m looking at you Baker McKenzie, but any US firms paying 150k and under, really) but now pay closer to Reed Smith than their top-of-the-market peers are starting to really harm their brand/attractivity to grads lol.

]]>
By: Question https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195274 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:15:23 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195274 Where is white & case? Way too close to firms it has traditionally distinguished itself from…

]]>
By: lol https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195268 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:28:35 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195268 Who need extra dough when you have prestigeeeeeee

]]>
By: MC Trainee https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195260 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:12:02 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195260 Ah so Slaughters are now paying the same as Reed Smith. I guess the prestige points are worth an extra £25k though.

]]>
By: Tom https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195256 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 07:44:16 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195256 What is NQ retention looking like?

]]>
By: Who’s next https://www.legalcheek.com/2024/07/reed-smith-and-ashurst-push-nq-solicitor-pay-to-125k/#comment-1195253 Thu, 11 Jul 2024 07:21:29 +0000 https://www.legalcheek.com/?p=206881#comment-1195253 Who you reckon will rise next that’s non MC/SC/US?

]]>